Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1458 DARDRIE ROZZELLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE; BANITA BROWN; ALISON WALSH; MARIA DELGADILLO; ALLISON STEDMAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1458 DARDRIE ROZZELLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE; BANITA BROWN; ALISON WALSH; MARIA DELGADILLO; ALLISON STEDMAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, C..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1458
DARDRIE ROZZELLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE; BANITA BROWN;
ALISON WALSH; MARIA DELGADILLO; ALLISON STEDMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dardrie Rozzelle, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Lou Trippe, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dardrie Rozzelle seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
report recommending dismissal of her civil complaint. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Rozzelle seeks
to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2