Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2107 WILLIAM WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00130-GCM) Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015 Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2107 WILLIAM WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00130-GCM) Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015 Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2107
WILLIAM WAGNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00130-GCM)
Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015
Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr., Margaret Hayes Jernigan, JERNIGAN LAW
FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland
Rose, Acting United States Attorney, James M. Sullivan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Wagner appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing, after a bench trial, his negligence action brought
pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b),
2671–2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014), and denying his motion for a
new trial. We have considered the parties’ arguments and have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wagner
v. United States, No. 3:12-cv-00130-GCM (W.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2014;
Aug. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2