Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tanya Anusie-Howard v. William Todd, 15-1343 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1343 Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1343 TANYA ANUSIE-HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM TODD, Building Operations Supervisor; MICHAEL BAKER, Field Representative; MIKE EPPIG, Senior Operations Supervisor; ANTHONY LEE; BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-00199-WDQ) Submitted: August 27, 2015
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1343 TANYA ANUSIE-HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM TODD, Building Operations Supervisor; MICHAEL BAKER, Field Representative; MIKE EPPIG, Senior Operations Supervisor; ANTHONY LEE; BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-00199-WDQ) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tanya Anusie-Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Elliot Konstas, Lisa Y. Settles, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tanya Anusie-Howard appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her claims alleging violations of the Family Medical Leave Act. We have reviewed the record, including the district court’s opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anusie-Howard v. Todd, No. 1:12-cv-00199-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2013, Nov. 18, 2013, and Feb. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer