Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6717 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANILO ALDUBLIN-ROBLETO, a/k/a Danilo Albudin, a/k/a Danilo Anthony, a/k/a Danilo A. Robletto, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:09-cr-00347-PJM-1) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6717 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANILO ALDUBLIN-ROBLETO, a/k/a Danilo Albudin, a/k/a Danilo Anthony, a/k/a Danilo A. Robletto, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:09-cr-00347-PJM-1) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANILO ALDUBLIN-ROBLETO, a/k/a Danilo Albudin, a/k/a Danilo
Anthony, a/k/a Danilo A. Robletto,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:09-cr-00347-PJM-1)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danilo Aldublin-Robleto, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Daniel McKenzie,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Danilo Aldublin-Robleto has filed a notice of appeal
purporting to appeal an order related to his supervised release.
Our review of the record reveals that the district court has not
entered any dispositive orders in Aldublin-Robleto’s case since
the entry of the criminal judgment on March 19, 2010. Moreover,
to the extent that Aldublin-Robleto is challenging the
imposition of supervised release, he has exhausted his direct
appeal. United States v. Aldublin-Robleto, 406 F. App’x 823
(4th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2