Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6501 JABBAR J. STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (5:13-cv-01802-BHH) Submitted: August 27, 201
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6501 JABBAR J. STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (5:13-cv-01802-BHH) Submitted: August 27, 2015..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6501
JABBAR J. STRAWS, a/k/a Jabbar Jomo Straws,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM R. BYARS,
JR., Director of the South Carolina Department of
Corrections, in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (5:13-cv-01802-BHH)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jabbar Jomo Straws, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jabbar J. Straws appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting
summary judgment to defendants and dismissing without prejudice
this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Straws
v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:13-cv-01802-BHH (D.S.C.
Mar. 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2