Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6745 HENRY LEWELL BUMPERS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DANIEL CALHOUN, JR., M.D.; J. SEGURA, R.N., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00497-RBS-TEM) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6745 HENRY LEWELL BUMPERS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DANIEL CALHOUN, JR., M.D.; J. SEGURA, R.N., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00497-RBS-TEM) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6745
HENRY LEWELL BUMPERS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DANIEL CALHOUN, JR., M.D.; J. SEGURA, R.N.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00497-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Lewell Bumpers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Henry Lewell Bumpers appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action
for failure to follow the court’s earlier orders informing him
that he needed to pay the initial partial filing fee or his
complaint would be dismissed. We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Davis v.
Williams,
588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978) (providing review
standard); see Ballard v. Carlson,
882 F.2d 93, 95–96 (4th Cir.
1989) (noting that dismissal is the appropriate sanction where
litigant disregarded court order despite warning that failure to
comply with order would result in dismissal). Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bumpers v.
Calhoun, No. 2:14-cv-00497-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2