Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Frederick Sellers, 15-7085 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-7085 Visitors: 47
Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Lynn Selle
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                            No. 15-7085


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                      Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS,

                      Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.   C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1)


Submitted:   September 9, 2015        Decided:   September 14, 2015


Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Frederick Lynn Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Frederick Lynn Sellers appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012).         We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by     the   district   court.         United     States      v.     Sellers,     No.

4:01-cr-00058-CWH-1 (D.S.C. July 6, 2015).                    We dispense with

oral    argument   because      the    facts    and   legal    contentions        are

adequately     presented   in    the    materials     before       this   court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                           AFFIRMED




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer