Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7092 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CRAIG CAMPBELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00221-1) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Craig Campbell, Appellan
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7092 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CRAIG CAMPBELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00221-1) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Craig Campbell, Appellant..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7092
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CRAIG CAMPBELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:02-cr-00221-1)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Assistant
United States Attorney, Betty Adkins Pullin, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia; John Lanier
File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Craig Campbell appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Campbell, No. 1:02-cr-
00221-1 (S.D.W. Va. June 19, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2