Filed: Sep. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6815 JAMES ANTHONY MAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons; CLAUDETTE EDWARDS, Superintendent; LIEUTENANT T. SMITH; DR. E. G. LAND; MINNIE KIMBLE, Program Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03318-FL) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: Septembe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6815 JAMES ANTHONY MAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons; CLAUDETTE EDWARDS, Superintendent; LIEUTENANT T. SMITH; DR. E. G. LAND; MINNIE KIMBLE, Program Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03318-FL) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6815
JAMES ANTHONY MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of Prisons; CLAUDETTE EDWARDS,
Superintendent; LIEUTENANT T. SMITH; DR. E. G. LAND; MINNIE
KIMBLE, Program Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03318-FL)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Anthony May, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Anthony May appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his challenges to his disciplinary
convictions for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and
dismissing without prejudice the remainder of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. May v. Solomon, No. 5:14-
ct-03318-FL (E.D.N.C. May 11, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2