Filed: May 07, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 367 F.3d 1087 Laffit PINCAY, Jr.; Christopher J. McCarron, Plaintiffs — Appellants, v. Vincent S. ANDREWS; Robert Andrews; Vincent Andrew Management Corp., Defendants — Appellees. No. 02-56577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 7, 2004. Neil Papiano, Patrick McAdam, Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Andrew W. Hayes, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Armonk, CA, for Defendants-Appellees. ORDER SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. 1 Upon the vote of a major
Summary: 367 F.3d 1087 Laffit PINCAY, Jr.; Christopher J. McCarron, Plaintiffs — Appellants, v. Vincent S. ANDREWS; Robert Andrews; Vincent Andrew Management Corp., Defendants — Appellees. No. 02-56577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 7, 2004. Neil Papiano, Patrick McAdam, Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Andrew W. Hayes, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Armonk, CA, for Defendants-Appellees. ORDER SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. 1 Upon the vote of a majori..
More
Laffit PINCAY, Jr.; Christopher J. McCarron, Plaintiffs — Appellants,
v.
Vincent S. ANDREWS; Robert Andrews; Vincent Andrew Management Corp., Defendants — Appellees.
No. 02-56577.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 7, 2004.
Neil Papiano, Patrick McAdam, Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Andrew W. Hayes, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Armonk, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
