Filed: Oct. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1455 In re: GARY WAYNE PRESLEY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (8:11-cv-01553-TLW) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Wayne Presley, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gary Wayne Presley has filed a petition for an original w
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1455 In re: GARY WAYNE PRESLEY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (8:11-cv-01553-TLW) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Wayne Presley, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gary Wayne Presley has filed a petition for an original wr..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1455
In re: GARY WAYNE PRESLEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(8:11-cv-01553-TLW)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Wayne Presley, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gary Wayne Presley has filed a petition for an
original writ of habeas corpus, claiming that the State of South
Carolina does not have jurisdiction over him for criminal
charges. This court ordinarily declines to entertain an
original habeas petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006),
and this case provides no reason to depart from this general
rule. Moreover, we find that the interests of justice would not
be served by transferring the matter to the appropriate district
court, see 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a), as
Presley has previously filed a § 2241 petition in the District
of South Carolina raising the same claims as he does in this
court. Accordingly, we deny Presley’s motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the § 2241 petition. To
the extent that Presley seeks mandamus relief, alleging delay by
a South Carolina state court, we also deny relief. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2