Filed: Oct. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1356 CHARLES RAWLINGS, Plaintiff _ Appellant, v. CITY OF BALTIMORE; MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00446-BEL) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1356 CHARLES RAWLINGS, Plaintiff _ Appellant, v. CITY OF BALTIMORE; MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00446-BEL) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1356 CHARLES RAWLINGS, Plaintiff _ Appellant, v. CITY OF BALTIMORE; MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00446-BEL) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Rawlings, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Rawlings appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rawlings v. Baltimore, No. 1:12-cv-00446-BEL (D. Md. Feb. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
