Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Phenroy Day v. Lisa Yeatts, 12-2114 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2114 Visitors: 39
Filed: Nov. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2114 PHENROY DAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. & MRS. LISA YEATTS; MR. & MRS. CANNY; MR. & MRS. ANGELA TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:12-cv-00127-RBS-FBS) Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2114 PHENROY DAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. & MRS. LISA YEATTS; MR. & MRS. CANNY; MR. & MRS. ANGELA TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:12-cv-00127-RBS-FBS) Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phenroy Day, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Phenroy Day appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Day v. Yeatts, No. 4:12-cv-00127-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer