Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nasir Ahmad-El v. S. Fekete, 12-2042 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2042 Visitors: 36
Filed: Nov. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2042 NASIR AHMAD-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. J. FEKETE, Badge #29293; C. BRYANT, Badge #19302; BADGE #19877, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 12-2042


NASIR AHMAD-EL,

                  Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

S. J. FEKETE, Badge #29293; C. BRYANT, Badge #19302; BADGE
#19877,

                  Defendants - Appellees.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM)


Submitted:   November 13, 2012              Decided: November 15, 2012


Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Nasir Ahmad-El, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Nasir    Ahmad-El    appeals   the     district   court’s     order

dismissing his complaint as frivolous.             We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.            Ahmad-El v. Fekete,

No. 2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. July 26, 2012).               We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately    presented   in   the   materials    before    the    court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                     AFFIRMED




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer