Filed: Nov. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2042 NASIR AHMAD-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. J. FEKETE, Badge #29293; C. BRYANT, Badge #19302; BADGE #19877, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2042 NASIR AHMAD-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. J. FEKETE, Badge #29293; C. BRYANT, Badge #19302; BADGE #19877, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2042
NASIR AHMAD-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S. J. FEKETE, Badge #29293; C. BRYANT, Badge #19302; BADGE
#19877,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nasir Ahmad-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nasir Ahmad-El appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Ahmad-El v. Fekete,
No. 2:12-cv-00405-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. July 26, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2