Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Dismissed by Supreme Court, November 3, 2014 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1179 CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00109-JRS) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed
Summary: Dismissed by Supreme Court, November 3, 2014 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1179 CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00109-JRS) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed b..
More
Dismissed by Supreme Court, November 3, 2014 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1179 CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00109-JRS) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order denying motion for leave to file a complaint because she failed to comply with the pre-filing injunction imposed by that court in 2006. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Connor v. Virginia, No. 3:14-cv-00109-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
