Filed: Mar. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7161 RYAN STILLMAN LUCAS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GARY L. SHIVELY; PATRICK LAMB, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 5, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John P. Fishwick, Jr.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7161 RYAN STILLMAN LUCAS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GARY L. SHIVELY; PATRICK LAMB, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 5, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John P. Fishwick, Jr.,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7161
RYAN STILLMAN LUCAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GARY L. SHIVELY; PATRICK LAMB,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 5, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John P. Fishwick, Jr., LICHTENSTEINFISHWICK, PLC, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellant. Jeremy E. Carroll, GLENN, FELDMANN,
DARBY & GOODLATTE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN &
DILLON, P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Stillman Lucas appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Lucas’ 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and state law claims for false arrest,
false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Shively, No. 7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. July 7, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2