Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Trevor Reed v. United States, 15-6773 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-6773 Visitors: 32
Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6773 TREVOR REED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and F.B.O.P.; J. FAJARDO, Prison Official, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD) Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 21, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 15-6773


TREVOR REED,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Defendant - Appellee,

          and

F.B.O.P.; J. FAJARDO, Prison Official,

                Defendants.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.     Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD)


Submitted:   September 30, 2015             Decided:   October 21, 2015


Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Trevor Reed, Appellant Pro Se.    Kimere Jane Kimball, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

     Trevor      Reed   appeals   the   district      court’s   order   denying

relief on his medical malpractice claim brought pursuant to the

Federal   Tort    Claims   Act,   28    U.S.C.   §§   1346(b)(1),   2671–2680

(2012).    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.         Reed v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00247-LMB-

IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2015).               We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

                                                                        AFFIRMED




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer