Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6773 TREVOR REED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and F.B.O.P.; J. FAJARDO, Prison Official, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD) Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 21, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6773 TREVOR REED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and F.B.O.P.; J. FAJARDO, Prison Official, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD) Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 21, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6773
TREVOR REED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
F.B.O.P.; J. FAJARDO, Prison Official,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00247-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 21, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trevor Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Kimere Jane Kimball, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Trevor Reed appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his medical malpractice claim brought pursuant to the
Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671–2680
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Reed v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00247-LMB-
IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2