Filed: Nov. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALOYSIUS JAMEGO BER MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9) Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALOYSIUS JAMEGO BER MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9) Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7324
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ALOYSIUS JAMEGO BER MCLAUGHLIN, a/k/a JB, a/k/a Loke,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9)
Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred
William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Aloysius Jamego Ber McLaughlin appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
McLaughlin, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-9 (D.S.C., Aug. 6, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2