Filed: Dec. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7904 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ROBERT GREEN, a/k/a Heavy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-4) Submitted: November 10, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ro
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7904 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ROBERT GREEN, a/k/a Heavy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-4) Submitted: November 10, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rob..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7904
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT GREEN, a/k/a Heavy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-4)
Submitted: November 10, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Green, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant
United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lamont Green appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his
sentence pursuant to Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2014). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying Green’s motion. See United States v. Smalls,
720 F.3d
193 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Green, No. 4:05-cr-00037-RBS-
FBS-4 (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2