Filed: Dec. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6883 PETER ANTHONY BAKOWSKI, Petitioner – Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Federal Medical Center at Butner, NC, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02078-D) Submitted: November 6, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6883 PETER ANTHONY BAKOWSKI, Petitioner – Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Federal Medical Center at Butner, NC, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02078-D) Submitted: November 6, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6883
PETER ANTHONY BAKOWSKI,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Federal Medical Center at Butner,
NC,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02078-D)
Submitted: November 6, 2015 Decided: December 4, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Anthony Bakowski, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Anthony Bakowski, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, and its subsequent order denying
his motions for reconsideration. On appeal, he pursues only the
claim that his restitution amount was improperly calculated. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bakowski v. Atkinson, No. 5:14-hc-02078-D (E.D.N.C.
Dec. 2, 2014). We deny Bakowski’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2