Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mehlek Dawveed v. Commissioner, 15-1815 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1815 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1815 MEHLEK DAWVEED; OLAJUMOKE O. OGUNFIDITMI, Petitioners - Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 6670-15L) Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015 Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mehlek Dawveed, Olajumoke O. Ogunfiditmi, Appellants
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1815 MEHLEK DAWVEED; OLAJUMOKE O. OGUNFIDITMI, Petitioners - Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 6670-15L) Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015 Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mehlek Dawveed, Olajumoke O. Ogunfiditmi, Appellants Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Senior Attorney, Janet A. Bradley, Caroline D. Ciraolo, Thomas J. Clark, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C.; William J. Wilkins, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mehlek Dawveed and Olajumoke O. Ogunfiditmi appeal from the tax court’s order dismissing their petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Dawveed v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. No. 6670-15L (U.S. Tax Ct. filed July 17, 2015 & entered July 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer