Filed: Dec. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7314 MILTON A. TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SOUTHSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00556-LMB-MSN) Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015 Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7314 MILTON A. TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SOUTHSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00556-LMB-MSN) Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015 Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7314
MILTON A. TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SOUTHSIDE REGIONAL JAIL,
Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00556-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015
Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton A. Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Milton A. Tyler appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Tyler v. Va. Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:15-cv-00556-
LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 6, 2015 & entered Aug. 10, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ We conclude that the dismissal order is final and
appealable. See In re GNC Corp.,
789 F.3d 505, 511 n.3 (4th
Cir. 2015) (discussing standard for determining finality of
order).
2