Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gloria Johnson v. Masonite International Corporation, 15-2166 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-2166 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2166 GLORIA ROBINSON JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:14-cv-02188-JMC) Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: February 9, 2016 Before KING, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gloria Robinso
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2166 GLORIA ROBINSON JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:14-cv-02188-JMC) Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: February 9, 2016 Before KING, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gloria Robinson Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gavin Stone Appleby, Emily D. Shoda, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Danny Michael Henthorne, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gloria Robinson Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment in favor of Appellee on Johnson’s age discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Masonite Int’l Corp., No. 5:14-cv-02188-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer