Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2325 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ACLU, of New York City; INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT; INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT, Plaintiffs, v. BALTIMORE MARYLAND, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers; NEW YORK CITY, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Distr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2325 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ACLU, of New York City; INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT; INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT, Plaintiffs, v. BALTIMORE MARYLAND, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers; NEW YORK CITY, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Distri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2325
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
ACLU, of New York City; INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT;
INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BALTIMORE MARYLAND, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law
enforcement officers; NEW YORK CITY, CHIEF OF POLICE, and
all law enforcement officers,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00320-BO)
Submitted: February 16, 2016 Decided: February 22, 2016
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing
this civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and conclude that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hurt v. Baltimore, Md., Chief of
Police, No. 5:15-cv-00320-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3