Filed: Feb. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7635 RICKY D. NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KAREN D. BROWN, Chairman of the Parole Board of Virginia “DOC”; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00285-AWA-LRL) Submitted: February 17, 2016 Decided: February 24, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circ
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7635 RICKY D. NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KAREN D. BROWN, Chairman of the Parole Board of Virginia “DOC”; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00285-AWA-LRL) Submitted: February 17, 2016 Decided: February 24, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7635
RICKY D. NELSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAREN D. BROWN, Chairman of the Parole Board of Virginia
“DOC”; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of VDOC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:15-cv-00285-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: February 17, 2016 Decided: February 24, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky D. Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ricky D. Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint without prejudice to his right to file
a petition for a writ of habeas corpus or an amended complaint.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of
the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Nelson seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid,
807 F.3d
619 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we deny Nelson’s motion to
appoint counsel, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction,
and remand the case to the district court with instructions to
allow Nelson to file an amended complaint or petition. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
2