Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7059 DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ANTHONY VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT SPARKS; SERGEANT WINN, Defendants – Appellees, and WAYNE COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03092-D) Submitted: November 23, 2015 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Cir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7059 DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ANTHONY VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT SPARKS; SERGEANT WINN, Defendants – Appellees, and WAYNE COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03092-D) Submitted: November 23, 2015 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7059
DEMAR WORRELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
ANTHONY VELASQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
SERGEANT SPARKS; SERGEANT WINN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
WAYNE COUNTY JAIL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03092-D)
Submitted: November 23, 2015 Decided: February 25, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart,
SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART PA, New Bern, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Demar Worrell appeals the district court’s orders granting
summary judgment to defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Worrell v. Sergeant
Sparks, No. 5:14-ct-03092-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2015 & June 11,
2015). We deny Worrell’s motion for medical records and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3