Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kenneth A. Greene v. Barack Obama, 15-2259 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-2259 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2259 KENNETH A. GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARACK OBAMA, President; ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary; FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; NANCY L. SPENCER GRIGSBY, in their individual and official capacities; GERARD R. VETTER, in their individual and official capacities; RONALD A. WRAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2259 KENNETH A. GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARACK OBAMA, President; ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary; FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; NANCY L. SPENCER GRIGSBY, in their individual and official capacities; GERARD R. VETTER, in their individual and official capacities; RONALD A. WRAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00658-RDB) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth A. Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth A. Greene appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint purporting to raise several civil claims against Defendants, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and agree that Greene’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We thus affirm the district court’s orders. Greene v. Obama, No. 1:15-cv-00658-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2015; Sept. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer