Filed: Feb. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7220 JEFF FARMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MHM MARYLAND, INC.; DR. VINCENT SIRACUSANO; DR. HOWARD PENN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14- cv-03080-PWG) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2015 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7220 JEFF FARMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MHM MARYLAND, INC.; DR. VINCENT SIRACUSANO; DR. HOWARD PENN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14- cv-03080-PWG) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2015 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7220
JEFF FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MHM MARYLAND, INC.; DR. VINCENT SIRACUSANO; DR. HOWARD PENN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14-
cv-03080-PWG)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2015
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeff Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald McGlenn Cherry, BONNER
KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeff Farmer appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s
motions to reexamine filing in forma pauperis, for appointment of
counsel, for injunctive relief, and to amend the complaint, and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farmer v.
MHM Md., Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03080-PWG (D. Md. July 2, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2