Filed: Feb. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2505 In re: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEE; HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN, Co-Chairperson, Petitioners. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (1:13-cv-00278-LMB-TCB) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold William Van Allen, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are no
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2505 In re: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEE; HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN, Co-Chairperson, Petitioners. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (1:13-cv-00278-LMB-TCB) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold William Van Allen, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2505
In re: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEE; HAROLD
WILLIAM VAN ALLEN, Co-Chairperson,
Petitioners.
On Petition for Extraordinary Writ.
(1:13-cv-00278-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold William Van Allen, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Howard William Van Allen petitions for an extraordinary
writ, seeking an order directing a variety of actions related to
the 2016 general election. * We conclude that Van Allen is not
entitled to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we deny Van
Allen’s motion for certification to the Supreme Court and his
petition for an extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
* Van Allen, a pro se litigant, may not represent the
interests of the Natural Born Citizen Party National Committee
and its members, as he attempts to do. See Oxendine v.
Williams,
509 F.2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975). Accordingly, we
consider Van Allen to be the sole petitioner.
2