Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Elvis Wayne Jones v. The Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts, 15-7666 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-7666 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7666 ELVIS WAYNE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE TEXAS BEAUMONT U.S. DISTRICT COURTS; THE TEXAS COUNTY(S): [CSCD]-MONITORING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00388-RAJ-RJK) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circui
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7666 ELVIS WAYNE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE TEXAS BEAUMONT U.S. DISTRICT COURTS; THE TEXAS COUNTY(S): [CSCD]-MONITORING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00388-RAJ-RJK) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016 Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elvis Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Elvis Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing for improper venue his complaint seeking a temporary restraining order or permanent injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. The Texas Beaumont U.S. District Courts, No. 2:15-cv-00388-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2015). We deny Jones’ motions for a temporary or permanent restraining order, injunctive relief, and damages and reimbursement. We also deny his motion to grant veteran’s emergencies. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer