Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Henk Rommy v. United States, 15-7955 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-7955 Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7955 HENK ORLANDO ROMMY, In the matter of the Extradition of, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00163-IMK-MJA) Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished p
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 15-7955


HENK ORLANDO ROMMY, In the matter of the Extradition of,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.    Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00163-IMK-MJA)


Submitted:   March 17, 2016                 Decided:   March 22, 2016


Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Defender, Clarksburg, West
Virginia, for Appellant.  Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant
United   States Attorney, Martinsburg, West  Virginia,  for
Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

     Henk Orlando Rommy seeks to appeal the district court’s

order   denying   his    appeal   of        the   magistrate   judge’s     order

certifying his extradition pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3184 (2012).

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C.     § 1291    (2012),       and     certain    interlocutory          and

collateral    orders,   28   U.S.C.    § 1292     (2012);   Fed.   R.    Civ.    P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
337 U.S. 541
, 545-

46 (1949).     The order Rommy seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.                      See

Zhenli Ye Gon v. Holt, 
774 F.3d 207
, 210-11 (4th Cir. 2014),

cert. denied, 
135 S. Ct. 2859
(2015).               Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                 We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.



                                                                        DISMISSED




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer