Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Celeste Broughton v. John McClain, Jr., 15-1569 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1569 Visitors: 57
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1569 CELESTE G. BROUGHTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ROBERT B. BROUGHTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN N. MCCLAIN, JR.; ROBERT GALEY; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00454-H) Submitted: April 26, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circui
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1569 CELESTE G. BROUGHTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ROBERT B. BROUGHTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN N. MCCLAIN, JR.; ROBERT GALEY; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00454-H) Submitted: April 26, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Celeste G. Broughton, Appellant Pro Se. William Sidney Aldridge, NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Debbie Weston Harden, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Celeste G. Broughton appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motion for disqualification of the district court judge. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We also deny Broughton’s most recent motion for reconsideration of this court’s prior order substituting the bankruptcy trustee as the Appellant as moot, as the trustee has been removed as the Appellant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer