Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Richard A. Santiago, 15-7934 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-7934 Visitors: 56
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7934 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD A. SANTIAGO, a/k/a Rick, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1) Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard A. Santiago, Appel
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                            No. 15-7934


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

RICHARD A. SANTIAGO, a/k/a Rick,

                Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1)


Submitted:   May 18, 2016                     Decided:   May 20, 2016


Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Richard A. Santiago, Appellant Pro Se.           Angela Mastandrea-
Miller, Assistant United States Attorney,       Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

       Richard     A.    Santiago      appeals     the    district          court’s      order

denying     his     motion      for     a     sentence    reduction              pursuant   to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).                 We have reviewed the record and

find   no   reversible         error.         Accordingly,          we    affirm     for    the

reasons     stated      by     the    district     court.            United        States    v.

Santiago, No. 3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2015).                                 We

dispense     with       oral    argument       because        the        facts     and   legal

conclusions       are   adequately          presented    in    the       materials       before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                                     AFFIRMED




                                              2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer