Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1066 JULIE A. GASKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OMOTAYO ABIODUN, Principal, Garrett Heights Elementary Middle School; BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS; MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02961-JKB) Submitted: May 18, 201
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1066 JULIE A. GASKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OMOTAYO ABIODUN, Principal, Garrett Heights Elementary Middle School; BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS; MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02961-JKB) Submitted: May 18, 2016..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1066 JULIE A. GASKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OMOTAYO ABIODUN, Principal, Garrett Heights Elementary Middle School; BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; BALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS; MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02961-JKB) Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julie A. Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se. Tamal Ajani Banton, Darnell Lamar Henderson, BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Baltimore, Maryland; Robert D. Anbinder, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Julie A. Gaskins appeals the district court’s order denying relief in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaskins v. Abiodun, No. 1:15-cv-02961-JKB (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2