Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2020 CURTIS E. LEYSHON, Petitioner – Appellant, – , v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 020983-13) Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Edward Leyshon, Appellant Pro Se. Caroline D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Bridget M. Rowa
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2020 CURTIS E. LEYSHON, Petitioner – Appellant, – , v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 020983-13) Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Edward Leyshon, Appellant Pro Se. Caroline D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Bridget M. Rowan..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2020
CURTIS E. LEYSHON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
– ,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
(Tax Ct. No. 020983-13)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Edward Leyshon, Appellant Pro Se. Caroline D. Ciraolo,
Acting Assistant Attorney General, Bridget M. Rowan, Clint A.
Carpenter, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C.; Olivia H. Rembach, Amy Dyar Seals, INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis E. Leyshon appeals the tax court’s order sustaining
the Commissioner’s assessment of a deficiency and penalty with
respect to his 2010 federal income tax liability and imposing a
penalty pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6673(a)(1) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Leyshon v.
Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 020983-13 (U.S. Tax Ct.
June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2