Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1067, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,319 Rutherford R. Williams v. Virginia Employment Commission, 75-1832 (1976)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 75-1832 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 23, 1976
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 542 F.2d 1170 13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1067 , 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,319 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rutherford R. Williams, Appellant v. Virginia Employment Commission, Appellee. No. 75-1832. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Sept. 23, 1976. Before
More

542 F.2d 1170

13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1067,
13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,319
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rutherford R. Williams, Appellant
v.
Virginia Employment Commission, Appellee.

No. 75-1832.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1976.

Before RUSSELL, Circuit Judge, FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge and WIDENER, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1

Rutherford B. Williams instituted an employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000(e) et seq., against the Virginia Employment Commission. The District Court held that the suit was barred by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution and accordingly dismissed the suit. We ordered that Williams' appeal be held in abeyance until the Supreme Court decided the case of Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, cert. granted, 423 U.S. 1031 (1975), a case which raised this identical question.

2

On June 28, 1975, the Supreme Court ruled that the Eleventh Amendment does not preclude a Title VII suit against a state. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, --- U.S. ----, 44 USLW 5120 (1976).

3

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer