Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elof Malm v. United States Lines Company, 31199 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 31199 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 05, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 378 F.2d 941 Elof MALM, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant. No. 489, Docket 31199. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued May 31, 1967. Decided June 5, 1967. Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Thomas E. P. McElligott, Fields, Rosen, McElligott & Auslander, New York City, for appellee. Before WATERMAN, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 We affirm on the basis of
More

378 F.2d 941

Elof MALM, Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 489, Docket 31199.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 31, 1967.
Decided June 5, 1967.

Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. P. McElligott, Fields, Rosen, McElligott & Auslander, New York City, for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion in the District Court, reported at 269 F. Supp. 731 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).1

1

Since neither party on appeal raised the issue of maintenance and cure, we have not considered that portion of Judge Weinfeld's opinion

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer