Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Greenwich Insurance Company v. Medical Mutual Insurance Company, 15-1107 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1107 Visitors: 35
Filed: Jul. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1107 GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MEDICAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00295-D) Submitted: May 31, 2016 Decided: July 14, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1107 GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MEDICAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00295-D) Submitted: May 31, 2016 Decided: July 14, 2016 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. R. Steven DeGeorge, ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Daniel J. Standish, Gary P. Seligman, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Medical Mutual Insurance Company (“MMI”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Greenwich Insurance Company on Greenwich’s complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to defend MMI in an underlying suit against MMI pursuant to an insurance policy Greenwich issued to MMI. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny MMI’s motion to attach court documents filed by Greenwich in an unrelated case to its opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer