Filed: Aug. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6482 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERSCELL JULIUS WORLDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6482 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERSCELL JULIUS WORLDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6482
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERSCELL JULIUS WORLDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1)
Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erscell Julius Worlds, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Erscell Julius Worlds appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. ∗
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Worlds, No. 2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1
(E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗Worlds’ notice of appeal was not timely filed. We decline
to dismiss the appeal, however, because the Government has not
moved to dismiss the appeal, and the appeal period in criminal
cases is not jurisdictional. United States v. Urutyan,
564 F.3d
679, 684-86 (4th Cir. 2009).
2