Filed: Aug. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1376 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. D.C. METRO TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION; THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, 1946 Hague Germany; THE INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT, 1946 Hague Germany; CHIEFS OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officials, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00468-F) Submitted:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1376 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. D.C. METRO TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION; THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, 1946 Hague Germany; THE INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT, 1946 Hague Germany; CHIEFS OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officials, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00468-F) Submitted: ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1376
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
D.C. METRO TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION; THE INTERNATIONAL
CRIMINAL COURT, 1946 Hague Germany; THE INTERNATIONAL PEACE
COURT, 1946 Hague Germany; CHIEFS OF POLICE, and all law
enforcement officials,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00468-F)
Submitted: July 25, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transp., No. 5:15-cv-00468-F
(E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2