Filed: Aug. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DUNTE ELAIR ROSE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4) Submitted: July 29, 2016 Decided: August 4, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry W. Shelton, Federal Publ
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DUNTE ELAIR ROSE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4) Submitted: July 29, 2016 Decided: August 4, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry W. Shelton, Federal Publi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6066
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DUNTE ELAIR ROSE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4)
Submitted: July 29, 2016 Decided: August 4, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Lisa Marie Lorish,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellant. John P. Fishwick, Jr., United States Attorney,
Craig Jacobsen, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dunte Elair Rose appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction in
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Rose, No.
5:13-cr-00030-MFU-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2016); see United States
v. Brown,
653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2