Filed: Oct. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1759 RONALD DAVID JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:16-cv-00016-NKM) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald David Jones, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1759 RONALD DAVID JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:16-cv-00016-NKM) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald David Jones, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1759 RONALD DAVID JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:16-cv-00016-NKM) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald David Jones, Appellant Pro Se. King Fitchett Tower, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald David Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his constitutional, civil rights, and discrimination claims against Liberty University, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Jones’ state law fraud claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Jones v. Liberty Univ., No. 6:16-cv-00016-NKM (W.D. Va. June 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
