Filed: Oct. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6746 CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; KENNY ATKINSON; NURSE BEASLEY; MATTHEW W. MELLADY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03115-BO) Submitted: October 7, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6746 CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; KENNY ATKINSON; NURSE BEASLEY; MATTHEW W. MELLADY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03115-BO) Submitted: October 7, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6746
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; KENNY ATKINSON; NURSE BEASLEY;
MATTHEW W. MELLADY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:16-ct-03115-BO)
Submitted: October 7, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Scott Wedington appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) his civil
action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). On appeal,
Wedington fails to explain how the district court erred in its
dismissal decision. Accordingly, Wedington has waived appellate
review of the court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v.
Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc.,
562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir.
2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4
(4th Cir. 2004). We thus grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2