Filed: Jan. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7152 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERTO SANCHEZ-ROQUE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00152-REP-2) Submitted: December 28, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7152 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERTO SANCHEZ-ROQUE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00152-REP-2) Submitted: December 28, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7152
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERTO SANCHEZ-ROQUE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cr-00152-REP-2)
Submitted: December 28, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roberto Sanchez-Roque, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roberto Sanchez-Roque appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2012) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Sanchez-Roque, No. 3:12-cr-00152-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Aug.
11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2