Filed: Jan. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1747 CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00883-TDC) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chong Su Yi, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1747 CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00883-TDC) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chong Su Yi, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1747
CHONG SU YI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:16-cv-00883-TDC)
Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district
court’s dismissal to show that it is without prejudice and
affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court.
Yi v. President of the United States, No. 8:16-cv-00883-TDC (D.
Md. Apr. 22 & May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner,
376
F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2