Filed: Jan. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7288 MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ERNEST A FINNEY, III; JAMES TURNER, Detective, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-01276-JFA) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7288 MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ERNEST A FINNEY, III; JAMES TURNER, Detective, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-01276-JFA) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7288
MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ERNEST A FINNEY, III; JAMES TURNER, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:16-cv-01276-JFA)
Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muttaqin F. Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Muttaqin F. Abdullah appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Abdullah v. Finney, No. 3:16-cv-01276-JFA (D.S.C. filed Sept.
13, and entered Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2