Filed: Jan. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7141 JULIO ZELAYA SORTO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PHILLIP STOVER; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03130-FL) Submitted: January 23, 2017 Decided: January 25, 2017 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julio Zelaya Sort
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7141 JULIO ZELAYA SORTO, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PHILLIP STOVER; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03130-FL) Submitted: January 23, 2017 Decided: January 25, 2017 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julio Zelaya Sorto..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7141
JULIO ZELAYA SORTO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PHILLIP STOVER; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03130-FL)
Submitted: January 23, 2017 Decided: January 25, 2017
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julio Zelaya Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special
Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas
Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julio Zelaya Sorto appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sorto v. Stover, No. 5:14-ct-03130-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11,
2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2