Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Rodgers v. Preferred Carolinas Realty, 16-1387 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-1387 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1387 ROBERT V. RODGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC.; JAMES E. ALLEN, JR.; JIM ALLEN GROUP, INC.; HARRY JAMES THORPE, Defendants – Appellees, and RANDALL EICHORN; LISA EICHORN; W. SIDNEY ALDRIDGE; NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00764-FL) Submitt
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1387 ROBERT V. RODGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PREFERRED CAROLINAS REALTY, INC.; JAMES E. ALLEN, JR.; JIM ALLEN GROUP, INC.; HARRY JAMES THORPE, Defendants – Appellees, and RANDALL EICHORN; LISA EICHORN; W. SIDNEY ALDRIDGE; NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00764-FL) Submitted: January 27, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. R. Hayes Hofler, III, HAYES HOFLER, PA, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Bryan T. Simpson, Natalia K. Isenberg, TEAGUE, CAMPBELL, DENNIS & GORHAM, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Robert V. Rodgers appeals from the district court’s order sua sponte granting reconsideration of a prior order and entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendants as to all of Rodgers’ claims. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, including the district court’s opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Rodgers (Rodgers v. Preferred Carolinas Realty, Inc.), No. 5:13-cv-00764-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer