Filed: Feb. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2099 CRYSTAL WEAVER BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Kaymani Daniels West, Magistrate Judge. (5:15-cv-00321-KDW) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2099 CRYSTAL WEAVER BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Kaymani Daniels West, Magistrate Judge. (5:15-cv-00321-KDW) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpub..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2099
CRYSTAL WEAVER BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Kaymani Daniels West, Magistrate
Judge. (5:15-cv-00321-KDW)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Crystal Weaver Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Crystal Weaver Brown appeals the magistrate judge’s order
upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Brown’s applications for
disability benefits and supplemental security income. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown
v. Colvin, No. 5:15-cv-00321-KDW (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
2