Filed: Mar. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2308 TINA BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDENWALD-GERMAN GENERAL AGED HOME OF BALTIMORE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-02513-JFM) Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 16, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2308 TINA BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDENWALD-GERMAN GENERAL AGED HOME OF BALTIMORE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-02513-JFM) Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 16, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2308
TINA BOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDENWALD-GERMAN GENERAL AGED HOME OF BALTIMORE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-02513-JFM)
Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 16, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tina Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Yoora Pak, WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tina Bond appeals the district court’s order granting
Edenwald-German General Aged Home of Baltimore summary judgment
on Bond’s claims, which were brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.
2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Bond v. Edenwald-German Gen. Aged Home of Baltimore, No. 1:15-
cv-02513-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2